![]() Overall, we feel SketchUp Pro is the best software for woodworking, as it’s simple to use and doesn’t confuse with irrelevant tools. SketchUp is not complete CNC software, since you need separate CAM software to generate g-code. SketchUp Free version has fewer features compared to Fusion 360 free.Īlthough adequate, SketchUp’s render engine is not as impressive as Fusion 360 or PRO100. In this article, we’ll I’ll compare my experience with the best free and paid woodworking software for beginners and advanced users, as well as the software to AVOID for woodworking design at the end of this article. The free version is super intuitive for beginners, with plenty of accessible tutorials – while the reasonably priced Pro version is packed with advanced features for professionals.įusion 360 also offers a comprehensive free version that you can scale right up to advanced 3D CAD, while SketchList 3D is a woodworking-specific platform with specific features for things like furniture and cabinet design. SketchUp is my top choice overall because it covers all bases. Woodworking is also spreading and becoming more accessible than ever before, as cheap CNC routers have opened the woodworking doors to newcomers.īut, what is the best woodworking software? ![]() From manually drawing with a pencil, it’s been a big shift to the woodworking design software we have today. I am using a quite recent build of the 0.20 development line, it's 0.20-26306.Woodworking really has changed a lot since the old days. I hope to find some advise about which direction to approach. Instead of flagging the individual objects, I would try to build an object which represents the cutting list, and then add a reference to every object which I would like to appear in the list. Not sure though if something like this is possible.ī) Turn the approach around. ![]() Especially I think that I would soon run into a situation where I want some links of an object in the cutting list output, so simply ignoring all links would not work on the long run.Īt the moment I have two thoughts how to approach this:Ī) Try to find a way to flag objects which not inherited by the link object. The links do also have the value "Cutlist" in it's propery "Tags".Īt this stage I am wondering how to approach the problem of distinguishing the wanted from the unwanted items in a way which does not interfere with the behavior of the link objects. I've used those to cut grove, dadoes, miters out of other items and it seems that this is the "trap" I got into. Now I got a lot of extra entries due to objects of the type "App::Link". In my macro I am iterating through all objects of the document, and if the current object is flagged, then I print a line with it's label and the dimensions of it's bounding box. My approach is to flag each item which I'd like to be in the list by using a custom property "Tags", and adding the value "Cutlist". It seems that I've put myself in a sort of trap due to the way how I flag the objects which I want to become part of the cutting list. Now I am somewhat stuck while trying to generate a cutting list in a semi automatic fashion with a macro. I've used FreeCAD to design a piece of furniture. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |